PERIDOT TREE WA, INC. V. WASHINGTON STATE LIQUOR AND CANNABIS CONTROL BOARD, ET AL.

Circuit 9Jan 2, 2026

Split Score

SplitScore: 65/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Affirmed

The Ninth Circuit affirmed two district court dismissals of challenges to Washington State and City of Sacramento cannabis-licensing schemes that favor in-state residents. The court held the dormant Commerce Clause does not extend to interstate trade in marijuana because Congress has made that market illegal under the Controlled Substances Act.

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether the dormant Commerce Clause applies to state residency or preference requirements in the licensing of marijuana businesses when marijuana remains illegal under federal law.

Circuit Positions

Circuit 1Circuit 2

Dormant Commerce Clause applies to cannabis markets; state residency preferences for dispensary licenses are unconstitutional.

Circuit 9(this circuit)

Dormant Commerce Clause does not apply to cannabis markets because Congress has banned the interstate market in marijuana under the CSA.

Conflict Summary

The First and Second Circuits have held that residency-based cannabis-licensing schemes violate the dormant Commerce Clause notwithstanding federal prohibition of marijuana. The Ninth Circuit here disagrees, concluding that the dormant Commerce Clause should not be extended to protect an interstate market Congress has declared illegal.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Peridot Tree WA, Inc.; Peridot Tree, Inc.; Kenneth Gay
Appellee:Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Control Board; William Lukela; City of Sacramento; Davina Smith

Legal Counsel

Appellant:Jeffrey M. Jensen PC; Kernkamp Law APC
Appellee:Office of the Washington Attorney General; Dean Gazzo Roistacher LLP; Sacramento Office of the City Attorney