US v. Baxter
Split Score
What is a Split Score?
This score (0-100) indicates how likely this case is to be reviewed by the Supreme Court based on:
Case Summary
Disposition
Affirmed
The First Circuit affirmed Patrick Baxter’s convictions and 240-month sentence for receipt, possession, and production of child pornography. The court upheld the denial of Baxter’s suppression motion, rejected challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence and constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), found no reversible evidentiary or sentencing error, and confirmed that images of the minor satisfied the statutory definition of “lascivious exhibition.”
Circuit Split Identified
Legal Issue
Whether an image constitutes a “lascivious exhibition” under 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(A) only if it depicts a minor’s genitals in a manner connoting sexual desire/willingness (stricter Hillie standard) versus application of the multi-factor Dost test without requiring a sexual come-on.
Circuit Positions
Apply Dost factors; sexual coyness by the minor is NOT required for a depiction to be a "lascivious exhibition."
Image is lascivious only if it portrays the minor’s genitals in a way that connotes the minor’s own sexual desire or willingness to engage in sexual activity (Hillie standard).
Conflict Summary
The D.C. Circuit (Hillie) holds that an image of a minor is lascivious only when the depiction conveys the minor’s own sexual desire or invitation to sexual activity, rejecting reliance on the broader, content-based Dost factors alone. The First Circuit, reaffirming Frabizio in this opinion, applies the Dost factors and finds that an image can be lascivious even if the minor shows no sexual intent or coyness. Thus, the First Circuit’s broader reading directly conflicts with the D.C. Circuit’s narrower interpretation.