Ronald Young v. Eric Keyes
Split Score
What is a Split Score?
This score (0-100) indicates how likely this case is to be reviewed by the Supreme Court based on:
Case Summary
Disposition
Reversed
The Eighth Circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal of Ronald Young’s §1983 excessive-force action, holding that the officers were not entitled to qualified immunity at the pleading stage because the body-cam and dash-cam footage did not conclusively contradict Young’s allegations. The majority found the takedown potentially unreasonable under Graham v. Connor, while a partial dissent argued the video plainly showed resistance and justified the force.
Circuit Split Identified
Legal Issue
Whether, at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage, a district court may (or must) consider objective video evidence of an incident when deciding a motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity.
Circuit Positions
Video may be considered on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion only when its authenticity is not disputed; otherwise the court confines itself to the pleadings.
Courts must or may freely consider clearly depicting video evidence at the pleading stage even when authenticity is contested, treating it as controlling if it contradicts the complaint.
Conflict Summary
Some circuits allow or require courts to consider video evidence at the motion-to-dismiss stage regardless of whether the parties dispute its authenticity, while other circuits (including the Eighth) limit consideration to videos whose authenticity is undisputed, otherwise deferring the evidentiary question to a later stage.