Nate Maniktala v. CIR

Circuit 8Aug 11, 2026

Split Score

SplitScore: 69/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Reversed

The Eighth Circuit held that the 90-day deadline in 26 U.S.C. § 6213(a) for filing a Tax Court petition is a non-jurisdictional claim-processing rule that can be equitably tolled. It therefore reversed the Tax Court’s dismissal of the Maniktalas’ untimely petition and remanded for the Tax Court to decide whether equitable tolling applies.

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether the 90-day filing deadline in 26 U.S.C. § 6213(a) is jurisdictional (thus barring untimely petitions) or a non-jurisdictional, equitably tollable claim-processing rule.

Circuit Positions

Circuit 2Circuit 3Circuit 6Circuit 8(this circuit)

§ 6213(a) deadline is non-jurisdictional and subject to equitable tolling

Circuit 7Circuit 9

§ 6213(a) deadline is jurisdictional; Tax Court lacks authority over untimely petitions

Conflict Summary

Several circuits have recently ruled that § 6213(a)’s deadline is non-jurisdictional and subject to equitable tolling, while earlier decisions in other circuits continue to treat the deadline as a strict jurisdictional bar that deprives the Tax Court of authority over late petitions.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Nate Maniktala and Jaya Maniktala
Appellee:Commissioner of Internal Revenue