USA V. FERRARI

Circuit 9Mar 23, 2026

Split Score

SplitScore: 58/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Affirmed

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s four-level firearms-trafficking enhancement imposed on Christian Ferrari for unlicensed gun sales. The court held that Application Note 13 to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) requires only that a defendant have reason to believe the transferee was a prohibited possessor or intended unlawful use, not that the transferee actually meet those criteria.

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether Application Note 13 to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) requires that the transferee actually be an unlawful possessor/intend unlawful use, or only that the defendant had reason to believe so.

Circuit Positions

Circuit 6Circuit 7Circuit 9(this circuit)Circuit 11

Enhancement applies when the defendant had reason to believe the transferee was prohibited or intended unlawful use; actual status of transferee need not be proven.

Circuit 10

Enhancement applies only if the transferee actually was a prohibited possessor or in fact intended unlawful use.

Conflict Summary

The Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits hold that the firearms-trafficking enhancement applies if the defendant had reason to believe the transferee was prohibited or intended unlawful use, regardless of whether that belief was true. The Tenth Circuit (Francis) requires the government to prove that the transferee in fact was a prohibited possessor or actually intended unlawful use before the enhancement applies.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Christian Ferrari
Appellee:United States of America

Legal Counsel

Appellant:Katherine M. Hurrelbrink, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of San Diego Inc.
Appellee:Andrew R. Haden, Shital Thakkar, Daniel E. Zipp, and Adam Gordon, United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of California