Gonzalez v. El Centro Del Barrio

Circuit 5Feb 6, 2026

Split Score

SplitScore: 46/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Affirmed

The Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court order remanding a data-breach class action to state court. It held that defendant CentroMed could not remove the case under either 42 U.S.C. § 233—because the Attorney General timely appeared and issued a negative deeming determination—or under 28 U.S.C. § 1442, because the removal was untimely.

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether, under 42 U.S.C. § 233(l)(1), the Attorney General must provide the substantive case-specific deeming determination within 15 days of notice, or whether a timely appearance stating that the determination is still pending suffices.

Circuit Positions

Circuit 3Circuit 11

Appearance within 15 days is sufficient even if the case-specific deeming determination is still pending.

Circuit 9

The Attorney General must provide the substantive deeming determination within the 15-day period.

Circuit 5(this circuit)

Acknowledges split but finds issue moot because Attorney General supplied the determination within 15 days; takes no definitive side.

Conflict Summary

The Eleventh and Third Circuits hold that the Attorney General complies with § 233(l)(1) by merely appearing within 15 days and advising that the case-specific deeming decision has not yet been made, whereas the Ninth Circuit requires the Attorney General to provide the actual deeming determination within the same 15-day window. The Fifth Circuit acknowledges the split, finding the Attorney General satisfied either approach and therefore does not decide which interpretation is correct.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:El Centro Del Barrio d/b/a CentroMed
Appellee:Arturo Gonzalez