United States v. Nemeth

Circuit 10Apr 13, 2026

Split Score

SplitScore: 74/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Affirmed

The Tenth Circuit affirmed the denial of James Nemeth’s motions to suppress drug-evidence obtained after a narcotics-dog sniff at his motel-room door and to dismiss his firearm indictment under § 922(g)(1). The panel held that Nemeth waived his core Fourth-Amendment argument and that his Second-Amendment challenge is foreclosed by circuit precedent, thus leaving the convictions intact.

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether a drug-detection dog sniff at the doorway of a dwelling (apartment or motel room) constitutes a Fourth-Amendment "search" because it intrudes on a reasonable expectation of privacy inside the residence.

Circuit Positions

Circuit 2Circuit 7

Dog sniff at the door of a dwelling is a search violating the resident’s reasonable expectation of privacy.

Circuit 4Circuit 8

Dog sniff at the door of a dwelling is not a search; Caballes categorical rule applies.

Circuit 10(this circuit)

Issue not decided; court declined to reach merits due to waiver under Rule 12.

Conflict Summary

The Seventh and Second Circuits treat a doorway dog sniff as a search that invades the resident’s privacy interest inside the dwelling, while the Fourth and Eighth Circuits apply a categorical rule from Caballes/Place that dog sniffs are never searches because they reveal only contraband. The Tenth Circuit in this case expressly declined to decide the question, treating it as waived, and thus took no substantive position.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:James Nemeth
Appellee:United States of America