Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz
Split Score
What is a Split Score?
This score (0-100) indicates how likely this case is to be reviewed by the Supreme Court based on:
Case Summary
Disposition
Affirmed
The First Circuit considered whether non-citizens who entered the United States without inspection must be detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) without bond or under § 1226(a) with the possibility of a bond hearing. Concluding that such individuals are not ‘seeking admission’ for purposes of § 1225(b)(2)(A), the court held that § 1226(a) applies and affirmed the district court’s order requiring the government to offer bond hearings or release the class representative, José Arnulfo Guerrero Orellana.
Circuit Split Identified
Legal Issue
Whether non-citizens who entered the United States without inspection are subject to mandatory detention without bond under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) or to discretionary detention with the possibility of bond under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
Circuit Positions
§ 1226(a) governs interior entrants without inspection; they are eligible for bond (mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2)(A) does not apply).
§ 1225(b)(2)(A) governs all aliens deemed ‘applicants for admission,’ including interior entrants without inspection; detention is mandatory and no bond is available.
Conflict Summary
Several circuits interpret the phrase “applicant for admission” in § 1225(b)(2)(A) (together with the ‘seeking admission’ clause) as limited to aliens arriving at the border, thus placing aliens already inside the country who entered unlawfully under § 1226(a) and making them eligible for bond hearings. Two circuits read § 1225(b)(2)(A) to cover all aliens deemed ‘applicants for admission,’ including those present in the interior without admission, thereby requiring their mandatory, no-bond detention.