United States v. Ford

10th CircuitOct 28, 2025

Split Score

SplitScore: 65/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Vacated

The Tenth Circuit held that kidnapping under 18 U.S.C. § 1201 is not categorically a "crime of violence" under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a); therefore, 18 U.S.C. § 3559(f)(2) did not require the district court to impose mandatory 25-year sentences on two child-kidnapping counts. The court vacated Ford’s sentences and remanded for resentencing without the mandatory minimum.

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether kidnapping under 18 U.S.C. § 1201 categorically qualifies as a "crime of violence" under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a) so that the mandatory-minimum sentencing provision in 18 U.S.C. § 3559(f)(2) applies.

Circuit Positions

7th Circuit

Kidnapping under 18 U.S.C. § 1201 is categorically a crime of violence; § 3559(f)(2) imposes a mandatory 25-year minimum.

1st Circuit4th Circuit10th Circuit(this circuit)11th Circuit

Kidnapping under 18 U.S.C. § 1201 is NOT categorically a crime of violence because it can be committed without physical force; § 3559(f)(2) therefore does not mandate the 25-year minimum.

Conflict Summary

The Seventh Circuit treats every § 1201 kidnapping conviction involving a child as a per se "crime of violence," triggering § 3559(f)(2)’s 25-year mandatory minimum, whereas the Tenth, Eleventh, First, and Fourth Circuits hold that kidnapping can be accomplished by non-forcible means such as inveigling or decoying and therefore is not categorically a crime of violence under § 16(a), so § 3559(f)(2) does not automatically apply.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Killiu Ford
Appellee:United States of America

Legal Counsel

Appellant:Gail K. Johnson, Johnson & Klein, PLLC
Appellee:Rajiv Mohan, Assistant U.S. Attorney (with Matthew T. Kirsch, Acting U.S. Attorney, on the brief)

Opinion Document