Jaime Navarro Cerritos v. Todd Blanche

Circuit 4Aug 11, 2026

Split Score

SplitScore: 61/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Reversed in Part

The Fourth Circuit granted Jaime Daniel Navarro Cerritos’s petition for review, held that it had jurisdiction, equitably tolled the 30-day filing deadline in 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1), and reversed, vacated, and remanded the BIA’s denial of withholding-of-removal and CAT protection. On the merits, the court found errors in the agency’s nexus, PSG, and CAT analyses, concluding that the record compelled a different result.

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether, after Riley v. Bondi (2025), a court of appeals has jurisdiction to review a withholding-only BIA decision when the petition for review does not expressly challenge the underlying final order of removal.

Circuit Positions

Circuit 3Circuit 4(this circuit)Circuit 7

Implicit or fairly inferred challenge is sufficient; courts have jurisdiction over withholding-only petitions that do not expressly contest removability.

Circuit 9Circuit 11

Petitioner must explicitly challenge the final order of removal; otherwise the court lacks jurisdiction.

Conflict Summary

Some circuits allow jurisdiction if the petition implicitly challenges the final removal order or if such a challenge can be fairly inferred; others require the petitioner to state an explicit challenge to the final order of removal to confer jurisdiction.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Jaime Daniel Navarro Cerritos
Appellee:Todd Blanche, Attorney General

Legal Counsel

Appellant:McKenzie Stoker, Andrew Porter, American University Washington College of Law; on brief Jayesh Maneklal Rathod, Immigrant Justice Center, American University, Washington, D.C.
Appellee:Christopher Ian Pryby, U.S. Department of Justice; on brief Brett A. Shumate, Assistant Attorney General, and Anthony C. Payne, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, U.S. DOJ, Washington, D.C.