US v. James Flood, III
Split Score
What is a Split Score?
This score (0-100) indicates how likely this case is to be reviewed by the Supreme Court based on:
Case Summary
Disposition
Affirmed
The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial—without an evidentiary hearing—of James Everett Flood’s § 2255 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to secure a plea agreement. The court held that the record conclusively showed no deficient performance or prejudice, because any plea offer would have required Flood’s cooperation, and nothing indicated he would have accepted such terms.
Circuit Split Identified
Legal Issue
Whether a defendant may raise a Strickland ineffective-assistance claim for failure to pursue plea bargaining when no formal plea offer was ever extended by the government.
Circuit Positions
Strickland claim may proceed without a formal plea offer (defendant can show prejudice by demonstrating a lost opportunity to negotiate).
A formal plea offer is required before a defendant may claim ineffective assistance in plea bargaining.
Question expressly left open / undecided.
Conflict Summary
The Sixth Circuit permits such Strickland claims even when no formal plea offer existed, while several other circuits have held that a formal plea offer is a prerequisite. In this opinion, the Fourth Circuit expressly notes the disagreement among its sister circuits but declines to take a definitive position, leaving the question open.