United States v. Stacy Owens -Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville

Circuit 6Dec 8, 2025

Split Score

SplitScore: 48/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Affirmed

The primary issue was whether Stacy Owens’s failure to self-surrender—charged as criminal contempt—should be treated as a felony or misdemeanor when calculating the Sentencing Guidelines range. The Sixth Circuit adopted a case-by-case, analogous-offense approach, deemed Owens’s contempt a felony under Guideline §2X5.1 by analogizing it to 18 U.S.C. §3146, and affirmed her 11-month consecutive sentence.

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether criminal contempt under 18 U.S.C. §401 must be automatically classified as a felony (Class A) for sentencing purposes or classified case-by-case based on the most analogous underlying offense.

Circuit Positions

Circuit 1

Criminal contempt is automatically a Class A felony regardless of underlying conduct.

Circuit 6(this circuit)Circuit 9Circuit 11

Criminal contempt is classified case-by-case by reference to the statutory maximum of the most analogous offense; it is a felony only when the analogous offense is a felony.

Conflict Summary

The First Circuit automatically treats all criminal contempt convictions as Class A felonies, while the Ninth and Eleventh Circuits (and now the Sixth) require a case-specific analysis that classifies contempt according to the statutory maximum of the most analogous underlying offense—sometimes resulting in misdemeanor or lower-class felony treatment.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Stacy Owens
Appellee:United States of America

Legal Counsel

Appellant:William G. Allensworth, Alex Thomason – Office of the Federal Public Defender, Nashville, TN
Appellee:Nicholas J. Goldin, Philip H. Wehby – United States Attorney’s Office, Nashville, TN