US v. Cooper

Circuit 1Aug 6, 2026

Split Score

SplitScore: 65/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Vacated

The First Circuit rejected most of Sherriff Cooper’s challenges to his convictions for sex-trafficking and transporting a minor for illegal sexual activity but agreed that the jury, not the judge, should have decided whether Massachusetts was a proper venue for the forced-labor count. Accordingly, it affirmed the first two convictions, vacated the forced-labor conviction, and remanded for further proceedings.

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Threshold showing a defendant must make to place criminal venue 'in issue' so that the jury — not the judge — must decide proper venue.

Circuit Positions

Circuit 1(this circuit)Circuit 3Circuit 4Circuit 5Circuit 9Circuit 10

Venue is 'in issue' whenever the defendant introduces evidence creating any genuine factual dispute; the jury must then decide venue.

Circuit 7

Venue goes to the jury only if the defendant makes it a 'serious issue'; overwhelming government evidence can keep the question from the jury.

Conflict Summary

Most circuits hold that a defendant places venue 'in issue' by introducing any evidence that creates a genuine factual dispute as to the location of the crime, triggering a jury determination. The Seventh Circuit, however, requires that the defendant make venue a more 'serious issue,' permitting courts to withhold the question from the jury when the government's venue proof is overwhelming.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Sherriff Cooper
Appellee:United States of America

Legal Counsel

Appellant:Judith H. Mizner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, District of Massachusetts
Appellee:Randall E. Kromm, Assistant United States Attorney; Leah B. Foley, United States Attorney