Kunze v. Baylor
Split Score
What is a Split Score?
This score (0-100) indicates how likely this case is to be reviewed by the Supreme Court based on:
Case Summary
Disposition
Affirmed
Hospital employees appealed the district court’s substantial reduction of their requested attorneys’ fees and costs in an FLSA collective action, while the hospital defendants cross-appealed contending the award was too high. The Fifth Circuit held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in applying the Johnson factors to reduce the lodestar and therefore affirmed the fee and cost awards, also denying any additional appellate fees.
Circuit Split Identified
Legal Issue
Proper methodology for determining a “reasonable” attorneys’ fee under federal fee-shifting statutes such as the FLSA—pure lodestar calculation versus the Fifth Circuit’s Johnson twelve-factor analysis.
Circuit Positions
Apply a pure lodestar method (hours × reasonable rate) with limited adjustments.
Apply the Johnson twelve-factor balancing test (sometimes referred to as lodestar) to set or adjust fees.
Conflict Summary
The Third Circuit (and circuits following the Supreme Court’s lodestar framework) calculate reasonable fees by multiplying hours reasonably expended by a reasonable hourly rate, with only limited adjustments. The Fifth Circuit continues to apply its Johnson twelve-factor balancing test—often labeling it a lodestar analysis—which allows broader, discretionary adjustments based on twelve subjective factors. This results in materially different fee awards for identical work.