UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. SRIPETCH, ET AL.

9th CircuitSep 3, 2025

Split Score

SplitScore: 60/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Affirmed

The Ninth Circuit held that the SEC need not demonstrate that investors suffered pecuniary harm before a court may order disgorgement of ill-gotten gains under 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5) or § 78u(d)(7). Aligning with the First Circuit and rejecting the Second Circuit’s contrary view, the court affirmed the district court’s $2.25 million disgorgement award against Ongkaruck Sripetch in an SEC civil enforcement action.

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether a disgorgement award under 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5) and § 78u(d)(7) requires the SEC to prove that investors suffered pecuniary harm.

Circuit Positions

1st Circuit9th Circuit(this circuit)

No requirement to prove investor pecuniary harm for disgorgement under §§ 78u(d)(5) & (d)(7).

2nd Circuit

Disgorgement under §§ 78u(d)(5) & (d)(7) is available only if investors suffered pecuniary harm.

Conflict Summary

The First and Ninth Circuits hold that the SEC need not show investors’ out-of-pocket losses to obtain disgorgement, viewing the remedy as focused on stripping the wrongdoer’s profits. The Second Circuit requires a finding of pecuniary harm, reasoning that disgorgement must restore the status quo for victims and thus cannot be awarded absent demonstrable financial loss.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Ongkaruck Sripetch
Appellee:United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Legal Counsel

Appellant:Brown White & Osborn LLP (Tyler R. Creekmore, Gregory T. Nolan, Kenneth P. White)
Appellee:Office of the General Counsel, United States Securities and Exchange Commission (Megan Barbero, Tracy A. Hardin, Daniel Staroselsky, Kerry J. Dingle, Christopher J. Dunnigan)

Opinion Document