US v. Fulcar

Circuit 1Jul 6, 2026

Split Score

SplitScore: 70/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Affirmed

The First Circuit affirmed Rey David Fulcar’s firearm and drug convictions and 96-month sentence. While the panel found the district court erred in treating a prior Massachusetts cocaine conviction as a qualifying predicate under the career-offender guideline, it deemed the error harmless because the judge stated she would impose the same below-guidelines sentence regardless. The court also rejected challenges to the validity of Fulcar’s guilty pleas and to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether the term “controlled substance” in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b)’s definition of a “controlled substance offense” is (a) keyed solely to substances listed in the federal Controlled Substances Act and determined as of the date of the defendant’s federal sentencing, or (b) includes substances controlled by the law of the convicting state even if they are not on the federal schedules (and/or should be measured as of the date of the prior conviction).

Circuit Positions

Circuit 1(this circuit)Circuit 2Circuit 5Circuit 9

‘Controlled substance’ in § 4B1.2(b) means a substance listed on the federal CSA schedules in effect at the time of federal sentencing; state-only controlled substances do not qualify.

Circuit 3Circuit 4Circuit 6Circuit 7Circuit 8Circuit 10Circuit 11

A predicate state offense qualifies if the substance was controlled by that state at the time of the state conviction, even if the substance is not listed on the federal schedules; timing reference is generally the date of the prior conviction.

Conflict Summary

The First, Second, Fifth and Ninth Circuits hold that § 4B1.2(b) looks only to substances controlled under federal law and that the relevant schedules are those in effect at the time of the federal sentencing. The Third, Fourth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Tenth and Eleventh Circuits count any substance criminalized by the state of conviction (regardless of federal scheduling) and generally measure controlled-substance status as of the date of the prior conviction.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Rey David Fulcar
Appellee:United States

Legal Counsel

Appellant:Inga L. Parsons
Appellee:Alexia R. De Vincentis (Assistant U.S. Attorney); Leah B. Foley (U.S. Attorney) – United States Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts