Zia Chishti v. Tatiana Spottiswoode

DC CircuitJul 7, 2026

Split Score

SplitScore: 47/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Affirmed

The 12th Circuit (D.C. Circuit) affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Zia Chishti and Sarah Pobereskin’s defamation-based lawsuit against Tatiana Spottiswoode and her attorneys. The court held that Spottiswoode’s congressional testimony was absolutely privileged, her post-hearing media statements were protected opinions or covered by the fair-reporting privilege, and that legislative privilege also barred related breach-of-contract and derivative tort claims. Accordingly, all claims were dismissed with prejudice.

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether the absolute litigation (and by close analogy, legislative) privilege extends beyond defamation-based claims to bar breach-of-contract actions arising out of the same protected statements.

Circuit Positions

Circuit 7Circuit 8DC Circuit(this circuit)

Absolute privilege can extend to breach-of-contract claims when the contract claim is predicated on the same protected statements.

Circuit 9Circuit 11

Absolute privilege is confined to defamation and does not bar otherwise viable breach-of-contract causes of action.

Conflict Summary

Several circuits have held that the absolute privilege can bar breach-of-contract claims when the alleged contractual breach is inseparable from the privileged communication, while others limit the privilege strictly to tort claims sounding in defamation.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Zia Chishti and Sarah Pobereskin
Appellee:Tatiana Spottiswoode, et al.

Legal Counsel

Appellant:Christopher G. Michel, Benjamin G. Chew, Andrew Crawford
Appellee:Matthew C. Daly, Mark Bailen, Martin S. Hyman, Jason R. Waters, John L. Slimm, Jeremy J. Zacharias, John D. Taliaferro, Nicole Travers, John Palenski