Castille v. Port Arthur ISD

Circuit 5Feb 24, 2026

Split Score

SplitScore: 49/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Affirmed

A former special-education administrator alleged that Port Arthur ISD and several school officials conspired to fire him in retaliation for reporting child-abuse incidents and thereby violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The Fifth Circuit held that the plaintiff’s reports and refusals to follow his principal’s preferred narrative were made pursuant to his official duties and therefore were not protected citizen speech; it further found no due-process violation, affirmed qualified immunity, and upheld dismissal of all claims.

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether a public employee’s refusal to alter or retract a truthful statement made within the scope of his employment is protected citizen speech under the First Amendment.

Circuit Positions

Circuit 5(this circuit)

Refusal to falsify or alter an internal report made in the course of official duties is NOT protected citizen speech; falls within employee’s job responsibilities under Garcetti.

Circuit 2

Refusal to withdraw or falsify a truthful on-the-job report IS protected First Amendment speech notwithstanding that it concerns the employee’s duties.

Conflict Summary

The Second Circuit has held that a police officer’s refusal to withdraw or falsify a truthful report constitutes protected speech even though the report concerns on-the-job matters, while the Fifth Circuit regards such refusals as unprotected because they are made pursuant to official duties under Garcetti.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Johnathan Castille
Appellee:Port Arthur ISD, Mark Porterie, Melissa Oliva, Monique Bienvenue, and Michael Oliver