USA v. Joshua Eugene Gaines

11th CircuitSep 10, 2025

Split Score

SplitScore: 64/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Vacated

The Eleventh Circuit vacated Joshua Gaines’s felon-in-possession conviction, holding that § 922(g)(1) does not reach his Alabama Class D felony because, given Alabama’s sentencing scheme, he could not have been imprisoned for more than one year. The court adopted a defendant-specific reading of § 922(g)(1) and concluded that "imprisonment" means actual jail or prison time, not community-corrections or suspended sentences.

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is interpreted in an offense-specific manner (looking to the statutory maximum for the predicate crime) or in a defendant-specific manner (looking to the maximum imprisonment actually available to the particular defendant).

Circuit Positions

4th Circuit8th Circuit9th Circuit10th Circuit11th Circuit(this circuit)

Defendant-specific reading of § 922(g)(1); crime counts only if THIS defendant could have been sentenced to >1 year of imprisonment.

0th Circuit

Offense-specific reading of § 922(g)(1); crime counts if the statute authorizes >1 year regardless of the defendant’s own exposure.

Conflict Summary

Most circuits now apply a defendant-specific approach under Carachuri-Rosendo and Moncrieffe, examining the imprisonment exposure the defendant himself faced; the D.C. Circuit continues to apply an offense-specific approach, looking only to the statute’s abstract maximum.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Joshua Eugene Gaines
Appellee:United States of America

Opinion Document