USA v. Lynell Guyton

3rd CircuitJul 18, 2025

Split Score

SplitScore: 41/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Affirmed in Part

The Third Circuit largely upheld Lynell Guyton’s federal convictions and 360-month sentence for fentanyl-trafficking, firearms, and money-laundering offenses. It held the evidence insufficient to support one felon-in-possession count, vacated that count, and remanded for entry of a judgment of acquittal, but rejected challenges to jury instructions, an alleged constructive indictment amendment, and the § 851 recidivist enhancements.

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

What standard of appellate review applies when a defendant fails to object to a district court’s omission of the § 851(b) colloquy—plain-error or harmless-error review?

Circuit Positions

3rd Circuit(this circuit)9th Circuit

Plain-error review applies to unpreserved § 851(b) colloquy errors.

0th Circuit

Harmless-error review applies to unpreserved § 851(b) colloquy errors.

Conflict Summary

The D.C. Circuit treats an unpreserved failure to conduct a § 851(b) colloquy as subject to harmless-error review, while the Ninth Circuit (and now the Third Circuit) apply plain-error review under Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b).

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Lynell Guyton
Appellee:United States of America

Legal Counsel

Appellant:Abigail E. Horn, Federal Community Defender Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Appellee:Adam N. Hallowell and Laura S. Irwin, Office of the United States Attorney, Western District of Pennsylvania

Opinion Document