Lopez Martinez v. Blanche

Circuit 1Apr 23, 2026

Split Score

SplitScore: 77/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Remanded

The First Circuit granted Victor Geovany Lopez Martinez’s petition for review, vacating the BIA’s denial of his asylum and withholding-of-removal applications. The court held that the BIA impermissibly applied a categorical rule that resistance to gang recruitment can never amount to a political opinion and failed to analyze Lopez’s religion-based claim, and therefore remanded for further proceedings.

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether the ‘one central reason’ causation standard or the more lenient ‘a reason’ standard governs withholding-of-removal claims under 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(A).

Circuit Positions

Circuit 5Circuit 6Circuit 7Circuit 8Circuit 10Circuit 11

‘One central reason’ standard applies to withholding of removal.

Circuit 2Circuit 3Circuit 4Circuit 9

Only ‘a reason’ is required for withholding of removal (no ‘one central reason’ requirement).

Circuit 1(this circuit)

Issue expressly noted but not yet resolved by the circuit.

Conflict Summary

Several circuits hold that, just as in asylum cases, a non-citizen seeking withholding of removal must prove that a protected ground is ‘one central reason’ for the threatened persecution. Other circuits require only that a protected ground be ‘a reason’ for the threatened harm. The First Circuit, in this opinion, acknowledges the split but again declines to choose a side.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Victor Geovany Lopez Martinez (with derivative applicant M.G.L.G.)
Appellee:Todd Blanche, Acting Attorney General

Legal Counsel

Appellant:SangYeob Kim; Gilles Bissonnette; Chelsea Eddy; American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire; Irene C. Freidel; PAIR Project
Appellee:Jennifer A. Singer, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice (with Brett A. Shumate and Shelley R. Goad)