US v. Njuh Fombe

Circuit 4Dec 15, 2025

Split Score

SplitScore: 41/100

Case Summary

Disposition

Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit affirmed Njuh Valentine Fombe’s convictions and 144-month total sentence for wire-fraud and money-laundering conspiracies and aggravated identity theft. The court held that it could include intended loss when calculating the Guidelines loss amount and that delegation of treatment details to the probation officer did not violate the non-delegation doctrine.

View Full Opinion Document (PDF)

Circuit Split Identified

Legal Issue

Whether the term “loss” in USSG § 2B1.1(b)(1) includes intended loss in light of Kisor v. Wilkie or is limited to actual loss only.

Circuit Positions

Circuit 4(this circuit)

Defer to Commentary—‘loss’ includes intended loss (greater of actual or intended).

Circuit 3

Ordinary meaning controls—‘loss’ means actual loss only; intended loss excluded.

Conflict Summary

The Third Circuit, relying on Kisor, interprets “loss” to mean only actual pecuniary loss, rejecting deference to the commentary that adds intended loss; the Fourth Circuit continues to defer to the commentary and counts intended loss when calculating the offense level.

Parties & Counsel

Parties

Appellant:Njuh Valentine Fombe
Appellee:United States of America

Legal Counsel

Appellant:Brent E. Newton, Gaithersburg, Maryland
Appellee:Erek L. Barron, U.S. Attorney; David C. Bornstein, AUSA; Jefferson M. Gray, AUSA; Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland